valtam wrote: Maybe there's something grammatical you can bash me for aswell while you're at it!
valtam wrote:And on an entirely different note: Junny, stop being an idiot.
valtam wrote: Maybe there's something grammatical you can bash me for aswell while you're at it!
valtam wrote:And on an entirely different note: Junny, stop being an idiot.
TOPIC HAS BEEN SPLIT by Junny... Please refer to : viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2661
Now Back onto topic Please.
Salvaged from Flame Topic in 'Anything Goes', Sorry for the inconvenience, Junny
PaPPy wrote:where's my original post you deleted junnyfg?
if you not going to take criticism on your suggestions, then get the **** over it.
if your going to move it to a bs section then dont delete it
Ozy {DD} wrote:I understand the reason behind ... But I still think, for the future new players ...
To keep the low level => up to Job 3 without a Cap of 80%
Job 1(newbie Job) => 100%
Job 2 => 100%
Job 3 => 95%
Job 4 to 9 => 80%
This way, new players with low intent skill can get to the 25 intent bar faster ...
Those with a higher intent skill won't stay with Job 1 to 3 for long (Doesn't pay enough) ...
zy
PS: Do rearrange the Jobs, having 2 the same or having 7 > 8 .. looks really unprofessional
Ozy {DD} wrote:I understand the reason behind ... But I still think, for the future new players ...
To keep the low level => up to Job 3 without a Cap of 80%
Job 1(newbie Job) => 100%
Job 2 => 100%
Job 3 => 95%
Job 4 to 9 => 80%
This way, new players with low intent skill can get to the 25 intent bar faster ...
Those with a higher intent skill won't stay with Job 1 to 3 for long (Doesn't pay enough) ...
zy
PS: Do rearrange the Jobs, having 2 the same or having 7 > 8 .. looks really unprofessional
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests