by Myckaal on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:52:30 +0000
Actually, I'll clarify, since I don't think anyone really got my point.
If your gang is in a war, should you expect any kind of fair treatment from the opposing gang, or is it a matter of just refreshing the other team's attack pages repeatedly? If this is the only hour out of the whole day to get online and try to get some IQ or money hacks in, do you have any option aside from begging? Even in war, some tactics are deemed "against the rules."
There's this thing called the "Geneva Convention" that was set up 60 or so years ago to deal with the treatment of prisoners and medics and such. My question was more directed at determining whether or not we should/would/could come up with an arrangement for the other casualties in the wars along a similar vein, or is it free-for-all and screw you if you don't like it?. The conditions of Cyber warfare bring other casualties into it. Members who aren't big enough to compete in the war, but who are still doing their IQ hacks , for example.
Personally, I'm of the "adapt and learn, or perish" mindset, with a heavy dose of "If you use dirty tactics, I sure will, too" mentality.I don't expect any courtesy myself, nor do I intend to intentionally just hand it out. I just thought I'd give a shot at seeing if anyone else wanted to suggest something like "give 10 minutes between killing someone in a war." Or maybe "don't kill anyone more than 5 times in an hour."
I'm not sure I would stick to any of it, but I thought I'd see what y'all had to say.
All reality is subjective