Go hacking
24 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Go hacking
by Rusty on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:20:08 +0000
27-5, from 11-4. I failed 16 times in a row, which has a 0.8% chance of happening. I also succeeded twice in a row, which has a 6.8% chance. Overall, taking 32 attempts has a 7.05% chance of occurring.
Annoyed that I locked your thread? Have I unfairly deleted your post? If you are sure that you didn't just forget to push the submit button, please see my rules to check you didn't break any of them! If you are still unhappy, please mail me (I like mail 
).
If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
).If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
- Rusty
- Member
- CW Profile
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:01:55 +0000
- Location: London, UK
Re: Go hacking
by fejky is inactive :) on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:36:16 +0000
anyway, chances should be updated 
- fejky is inactive :)
- Donator
- CW Profile
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:17:50 +0000
Re: Go hacking
by Rusty on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:55:44 +0000
But then we wouldn't have this debate 
-- Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:39:28 +0000 --
22-5 today, which has odds of 12.75%. Failed 10 times in a row, which has a 5% chance of happening.
-- Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:39:28 +0000 --
22-5 today, which has odds of 12.75%. Failed 10 times in a row, which has a 5% chance of happening.
Annoyed that I locked your thread? Have I unfairly deleted your post? If you are sure that you didn't just forget to push the submit button, please see my rules to check you didn't break any of them! If you are still unhappy, please mail me (I like mail ).
If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
).If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
- Rusty
- Member
- CW Profile
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:01:55 +0000
- Location: London, UK
Re: Go hacking
by fejky is inactive :) on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:50:10 +0000
Imagine what a waste that would be...
Yesterday i had 4 successes in a row!
Yesterday i had 4 successes in a row!
- fejky is inactive :)
- Donator
- CW Profile
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:17:50 +0000
Re: Go hacking
by Rusty on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:11:53 +0000
0.5% of that
-- Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:56:23 +0000 --
7-5 today! 11.43% chance of occurring.
-- Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:56:23 +0000 --
7-5 today! 11.43% chance of occurring.
Annoyed that I locked your thread? Have I unfairly deleted your post? If you are sure that you didn't just forget to push the submit button, please see my rules to check you didn't break any of them! If you are still unhappy, please mail me (I like mail ).
If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
).If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
- Rusty
- Member
- CW Profile
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:01:55 +0000
- Location: London, UK
Re: Go hacking
by Blanz on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:16:59 +0000
today i failed 37 times in a row on CIA. (thats not total, that's just in a row. i just completed my third hack)
theres a .79% chance of this happening. How many times do i have to get "unlucky" before it becomes ridiculous?
theres a .79% chance of this happening. How many times do i have to get "unlucky" before it becomes ridiculous?
- Blanz
- Member
- CW Profile
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:18:01 +0000
- Location: THE JERSEY SHORE
Re: Go hacking
by Void is a BIG FAGGOT on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:30:13 +0000
ummm, 10 Jails, 5 Fails, 4 Success. 35% Success Rate. You guys are unlucky.
- Void is a BIG FAGGOT
- Member
- CW Profile
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:35:33 +0000
Re: Go hacking
by [7S]Mojo on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:17:56 +0000
look u guys need to stop bitching about this. upgrade your bus/hacking if its really bothering you. the servers JUST reset. its normal to fail at hacking bc everyone has >100 hacking right now. power hungry already :O
like the tut says, go iq first, play it slow, its common sense, use all your energy on hacking skill/bus/get level 10 for eq/hacking at least 40 asap. hack cia for 3.75 iq a day. train bus and hacking more if u want to use a lot less energy completing daily hacks, keep gaining iq then use all your energy to train hdd/ram/whatever once ur iq is 50 ie, train, you suddenly can kill 95% of players.
edit: god damn i was angry last night lol, but yeah that's what im doing and i complete all 5 CIA hacks in 10 tries 20 at most
like the tut says, go iq first, play it slow, its common sense, use all your energy on hacking skill/bus/get level 10 for eq/hacking at least 40 asap. hack cia for 3.75 iq a day. train bus and hacking more if u want to use a lot less energy completing daily hacks, keep gaining iq then use all your energy to train hdd/ram/whatever once ur iq is 50 ie, train, you suddenly can kill 95% of players.
edit: god damn i was angry last night lol, but yeah that's what im doing and i complete all 5 CIA hacks in 10 tries 20 at most
- [7S]Mojo
- Donator
- CW Profile
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:01:55 +0000
Re: Go hacking
by Rusty on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:44:29 +0000
Today I did it in 6-5 
which has odds of 9%.
-- Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:51:23 +0000 --
Summary so far: 30/141 successes, which is 21.3% of an expected 26%.
-- Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:45:47 +0000 --
4-5 today, odds of 4.5%.
-- Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:04:25 +0000 --
Doing CIA hacks now and my odds of success have changed by 1% so totalling it up.
Total: 35/150=23.3%, very near the expected 40.6 successes, enough to just say I'm slightly unlucky
Debate over?
which has odds of 9%.-- Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:51:23 +0000 --
Summary so far: 30/141 successes, which is 21.3% of an expected 26%.
-- Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:45:47 +0000 --
4-5 today, odds of 4.5%.
-- Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:04:25 +0000 --
Doing CIA hacks now and my odds of success have changed by 1% so totalling it up.
Total: 35/150=23.3%, very near the expected 40.6 successes, enough to just say I'm slightly unlucky
Debate over?
Annoyed that I locked your thread? Have I unfairly deleted your post? If you are sure that you didn't just forget to push the submit button, please see my rules to check you didn't break any of them! If you are still unhappy, please mail me (I like mail ).
If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
).If your reading this, you have a good attention to detail. We need people like you to help us out on the CW wiki. Apply for the roll by mailing me.
Seen a really good suggestion? Mark it as a Top Suggestion!
- Rusty
- Member
- CW Profile
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:01:55 +0000
- Location: London, UK
24 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests